You know the law. You need the data.

Every IEEPA recovery engagement starts with data. We provide entry-level analysis covering HTS classifications under 9903.01 and 9903.02, duty amounts per entry, liquidation status, and applicable deadlines. This gives you the foundation to scope CIT engagement terms, estimate recovery value, and advise your client on the optimal path forward.

For cases that require CIT litigation — whether because the 180-day protest window has closed or because the importer wants to preserve maximum refund rights — you retain the litigation engagement and fees. We handle the data preparation.

Some importers prefer immediate capital over government processing timelines. When a validated claim is presented to institutional buyers, the attorney reviews the assignment structure, advises the client on terms, and ensures the transaction is properly documented. Referral fees apply to every assignment that proceeds.

This is not a competing service — it is a complementary one. Importers who choose immediate capital still need counsel to review the assignment. Importers who choose CIT litigation still need an attorney to file. Either path generates revenue for your practice.

The partner model generates revenue from three sources: referral fees on assessments you facilitate, engagement fees on CIT cases you litigate, and advisory fees on claim assignments you review. The specific fee structure depends on the engagement type and is outlined during your partner setup call.

There is no cost to join. No minimum commitment. No exclusivity requirement. You refer the clients you choose and retain full control of the attorney-client relationship.